Mens rea, or criminal intent, includes four possible states of mind. Common with all criminal offences in canada are the basic requirements that the crown must prove there was an action or omission known as the actus reus and that there was a simultaneous criminal intent known as the mens rea within particular circumstance. Define actus reus and mens rea explain the difference of how actus reus can be the crime itself versus how it must cause harm as a requirement recall situations in which involuntary conduct. English criminal lawactus reus wikibooks, open books. These typically are public welfare offenses or crimes that protect public safety and security by regulating. Dec 08, 2015 the legal term actus reus, as used in modern times, stems from the 16th century writings of sir edward coke, in which he stated actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, which means an act does not make a person guilty unless his mind is also guilty. Have students discuss the state of mind and actions involved in each. The actus reus of an offence can be found in statute or common law. We learned that while mens rea involves the intent of the offender to commit the crime, actus reus involves the actual action of. In general, the more serious a crime is, the more important it is for the. Mens rea selfmade notes criminal law laws10032 studocu.
English criminal lawmens rea wikibooks, open books for an. Mens rea and actus reus essentials of a crime ipleaders. To obtain a criminal conviction, the prosecution must establish the presence of two elements at the time of the crimenamely, actus reus guilty act and mens rea guilty mind. Thus, it either represents the conduct andor the consequences that follow as a result of the conduct. It is a principle of english law that the actus reus and mens rea must coincide. All the physical elements of the crime are actus reus and the intent to carry out the crime is called mens rea. Angus can be charged with constructive murder of chris under section 3a 1 of the crimes act 1958, but the prosecution must prove all the elements of the offence beyond a reasonable doubt. Likewise, for genocide an accused must act with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national. This resource is meant to accompany the criminal law unit in law 30 sk. Difference between mens rea and actus reus compare the. Actus reus the actus reus requirement for murder is that angus caused the death of a human being and that his actions were voluntary. A person can not usually be found guilty of a criminal offence unless two elements are present. It usually has to be voluntary with d conscious of his actions hill v baxter.
Mens rea elements are often harder to spot in legislation as the words are adjectives, generally nonstandard and emotive. Students will be able to define and apply both terms in two case studies that are included in this handout. Mens rea and actus reus assignment sandalwood heights. The actus reus is the conduct element of an offence, this is what the defendant must have been proved to have done. A failure to show the presence of these elements will lead to an unconditional acquittal of the charged crime.
As can be seen, there is no requirement of a consequence so it doesnt matter whether, for example, the accused actually managed to get away with the property theft is committed if there is an appropriation of property. As can be seen, there is no requirement of a consequence so it doesnt matter whether, for example, the accused actually managed to get away with the property theft is committed if there is an appropriation of property belonging to another together. In the usa and the uk, a criminal act actus reus, in order to be criminal, must be paired with a culpable mental state mens rea, meaning knowing intent to commit a crime. Mens rea is only one of two components of a crime, the other being the actus reus. Traditionally, the criminal law held that that commission of a criminal act requires both mens rea, or a guilty mind, and an actus reus, or a bad act. Pdf on oct 29, 2012, courtney klein and others published guilty act, guilty mind.
Actus reus refers to the physical aspect of a crime while mens rea refers to the mental aspect. Mens rea is the guilty mind or guilty intention to commit a crime, with the intention of causing hurt to another person, animal, or with the express intention of disturbing the peace. Strict liability offenses require an actus reus, but do not incorporate a mens rea requirement. Apr 14, 2020 the relationship between actus reus and mens rea goes to the heart of understanding and judging any crime. Jan 29, 2020 the following is law and analysis for actus reus the actus reas for manslaughter is identical to murder, and is therefore present, as discussed above. Actus reus is the latin term used to describe a criminal act. The most serious or culpable is purposely, and then knowingly, recklessly, and negligently. To establish actus reus, a lawyer must prove that the accused party was responsible for a deed prohibited by criminal law. Movements made in an epileptic seizure are not acts, nor are movements made by a somnambulist before awakening, even if they result in.
The role of defences is also considered, as the way that defences are named and grouped can cause confusion and obscure underlying principles. An act may be any kind of voluntary human behaviour. What is the relationship between actus reus and mens rea. The mens rea guilty state of mind required before a person can be convicted of a crime is specified in the definition of every crime. This student handout details the mental elements of a crime actus reus and mens rea. Every crime must be considered in two partsthe physical act of the crime actus reus and the mental intent to do the crime mens rea. Mens rea the mental element the principle of coexistence or simultaneity requires that the actus reus and mens rea must be present at the same time in order for an offence to be made out the mens rea fault element of an offence should generally extend to all elements of the actus reus prohibited act. This chapter completes our introduction to the basic elements of a crime by introducing you to criminal intent, concurrence, and causation. Johnson, rethinking the presumption of mens rea, 47 wake forest l.
A book has been published that is devoted to the various forensic aspects of sleep medicine shapiro and mccall smith, 1997. Exam heading a mens rea state the law this is the analysis in this situation, there is insufficient evidence of intention exam heading b actus reus state the law this is the analysis here, it is clear that ds actions were voluntary, and that the act caused the death of v. The term actus reus may conceal important underlying principles, while the fact that mens rea is used in a number of different sense can also create issues. To establish actus reus, a lawyer must prove that the accused party was. These two separate issues are often referred to as the two elements of any crime, though the amount of influence they exert over a legal trial may vary depending on the circumstances. Actus reus can be loosely translated as guilty act and is a vital component when attempting to assess the criminal liability of an individual. The legal definition of automatism is based upon this doctrine. The mens rea of a crime is made up of those elements which relate to the state of mind of the accused. It is therefore a principle of our legal system, as probably it is of every other, that the essence of an offense is the wrongful intent, without which it cannot exist. The actus reus of causing death started with the victim being stuck on the head and continued until he died of exposure. Actus reus mens rea by kreativeteach teachers pay teachers. Meanwhile the mens rea is the mental element of the crime.
The relationship between actus reus and mens rea goes to the heart of understanding and judging any crime. The crown must prove both elements of the offence, the actus reus and the mens rea, beyond a reasonable doubt. Both these terms have a very specific meaning which varies according to the crime, but the important thing is that to be guilty of an offence, an accused must not only have behaved in a particular way, but must also usually have had a particular mental attitude to that. Mens rea and actus reus scenarios mrs sudds classroom. There are various different ways in which an actus reus can arise, and also a plethora of ways in which it can be negated. Fundamental principles of criminal liabilityactus reus. Actus reus definition and meaning collins english dictionary. Sep 04, 2017 liability in criminal law is based on two things the guilty act and guilty state of mind. Criminal law lecture 2 actus reus criminal law lecture 2. If we are concerned with the morally innocent, should there be a mens rea element for the sale actus reus element. The mens rea requirement for a crime is usually represented in the relevant criminal statute by one of the following terms. This section will begin by identifying and explaining the various types of actus reus, examining how they may arise and what kind of conduct is required. As a general rule the act or omission causing death and the relevant mens rea must occur at the same time.
Use the three comic book panels to illustrate the concepts of mens rea, actus reus and wilful blindness. Undoubtedly, the actus reusmens rea distinction is an extension of the obvious difference. Mens rea, or guilty mind, marks a central distinguishing feature of criminal law. What is the difference between actus reus and mens rea. Actus reus and mens rea actus reus and mens rea are two of the five elements of a crime that the prosecution may have to prove to get a conviction in a criminal case. Mens rea and actus reus forensic psychology iresearchnet. The legal term actus reus, as used in modern times, stems from the 16th century writings of sir edward coke, in which he stated actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea, which means an act does not make a person guilty unless his mind is also guilty. There can be no crime large or small, without an evil mind. It is common sense that a person must be found to have done the illegal act.
An act committed without mens rea cannot properly be called a crime. The latin term for a guilty act, actus reus refers to the actions of the defendant. For an offence to take place both the mens rea and the actus reus must the present, however if the offence is part of a continuing act then the existence of the mens rea in the offence can be present at any time. Fundamental principles of criminal liability actus reus and mens rea authors. This examination of the mental element or mens rea. This must be resisted as there are many ingredients in the answer, which requires careful planning and organization. Used in a grade 12 law class, but can be used for any grade. Next up, law and analysis for mens rea however, the mens rea is different. Actus reus an introduction actus reus is the physical part of a crime. Undoubtedly, the actus reus mens rea distinction is an extension of the obvious difference.
A mens rea refers to the state of mind statutorily required in order to convict a particular defendant of a particular crime. This concept is the basis of todays legal test of guilt, which requires proof of fault. This result is the same as that which results from a lack of actus reus because, as noted above, both mens rea and actus reus are elements of the crime that must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and if they cannot be proven the defendant will be exonerated of the charged crime. Mens rea and actus reus are two essentials of any crime and are the principles used in most common law countries. The actus reus was the act of putting the car on the policemans foot. English law often requires inention as to the consequence element of the actus reus while a lower degree of falt is considered sufficient in regard to the circumstantial element. In our example of theft, the mens rea elements are dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive. Doc coincidence of actus reus and mens rea priya shan.
The actus reus elements of theft are appropriation of property that belongs to another. Liability in criminal law is based on two things the guilty act and guilty state of mind. English criminal lawmens rea wikibooks, open books for. How to answer law examination questions following the irac.
English criminal lawactus reus wikibooks, open books for. The insanity defense, in contrast, can excuse a defendant from. Introduction in the last chapter we noted that a criminal act or actus reus is required to exist in unison with a criminal intent or mens rea, and as you soon will see, these two components must com bine to cause a prohibited injury or harm. Criminal liability requires not only causing a prohibited harm or evil the actus reus of an offense but also a particular state of mind with regard to. An injury caused without mens rea might be grounds for civil liability but typically not for criminal. Neither element on its own was sufficient to justify criminal sanctions. Mens rea, or guilty mind, is the requirement that a defendant possess a particular state of mind at the time the crime is committed. The mens rea is regarded as transferred when this divergence is immaterial to the definition of the offence. As an example, consider the definition of theft stated in the introduction. Thinking, again, in terms of the moral evil that the statute is meant to prevent.
1158 252 562 764 725 456 350 14 649 244 1398 1030 1190 1104 405 1210 153 1348 61 1471 1105 129 549 860 783 606 1093 344 934 128 302 829 1269 1290 5 601 987 340 1100 1172 669 1200 1341